On Mon 2014-06-09 13:03:31, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so > > > > cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky > > > > that it worked for a while. > > > > > > git bisect really likes 25f397a429dfa43f22c278d0119a60 - you're about > > > the 5th report or so that claims this is the culprit but it's > > > something else. The above code is definitely not used in i915 so bogus > > > bisect result. > > > > Note I did not do the bisect, I only attempted revert and test. > > > > And did three boots of successful s2ram.. only to find out that it > > does not really fix s2ram, I was just lucky :-(. > > > > Unfortunately, this means my s2ram problem will be tricky/impossible > > to bisect :-(. > > Welcome to the situation I have been in for past several months. Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out that 3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun, anyway... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
