On Mon 2014-06-09 11:25:20, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so > > cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky > > that it worked for a while. > > git bisect really likes 25f397a429dfa43f22c278d0119a60 - you're about > the 5th report or so that claims this is the culprit but it's > something else. The above code is definitely not used in i915 so bogus > bisect result. Note I did not do the bisect, I only attempted revert and test. And did three boots of successful s2ram.. only to find out that it does not really fix s2ram, I was just lucky :-(. Unfortunately, this means my s2ram problem will be tricky/impossible to bisect :-(. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
