On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 07:46:46AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 07:51:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > void i915_gem_release(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > > index 93d7f7246588..2d06aad4a954 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > > @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(struct list_head *vmas, > > /* check for potential scanout */ > > if (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_bound(obj) && > > i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt(obj)->pin_count) > > What is it about these checks you like so much? You haven't taken the > patches to convert this to if (obj->pin_display) and you haven't > converted them to obj->frontbuffer_bits in this patch either! Just didn't touch them. But yeah, these should be converted to obj->frontbuffer_bits I guess. -Daniel > > > - intel_mark_fb_busy(obj, ring); > > + intel_fb_invalidate(obj, ring); > > > > /* update for the implicit flush after a batch */ > > obj->base.write_domain &= ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS; > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
