On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 07:51:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > void i915_gem_release(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > index 93d7f7246588..2d06aad4a954 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(struct list_head *vmas, > /* check for potential scanout */ > if (i915_gem_obj_ggtt_bound(obj) && > i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt(obj)->pin_count) What is it about these checks you like so much? You haven't taken the patches to convert this to if (obj->pin_display) and you haven't converted them to obj->frontbuffer_bits in this patch either! > - intel_mark_fb_busy(obj, ring); > + intel_fb_invalidate(obj, ring); > > /* update for the implicit flush after a batch */ > obj->base.write_domain &= ~I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS; -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
