On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:39:29 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> - If you have a machine which uses tiled framebuffers and enables > >> swizzling in the BIOS your code will a) drop the swizzle setup in > >> gem_init_hw, breaking resume b) not set the swizzle settings correctly > >> in swizzle_detect, breaking swap in/out and pwrite/pread. Not sure such > >> a machine exists, but still. > > > > This would affect krh's MBA, which is why I wanted testing here... > > anyway I'll spin a new one and ask krh to test again. > > Hm, I've thought the issue with the MBA is that it used tiled fbs, but > non-swizzled. And then a mess ensued when we've enabled it. But yeah, > unfortunately with the new logic we need to retest :( Ah yeah I think you're right, either way, need more testing. Maybe we should have just gone with the first patch to never enable swizzling based on Art's assertion that it didn't matter. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
