On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, that's what I do below... I even added it to the changelog: > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/27223/ > > Did you miss the later hunk in intel_display.c? > > What we try to do here is enable swizzling if possible, which we can do > if no inherited fbs are tiled. > > So I think I've done exactly what you repeated above, and documented > it. So you're going to need to repeat it with different words so I can > understand, if I'm still missing something. In swizzle_detect: ... if (GEN6+) { if (preserve_bios_swizzle) { if (I915_READ(DISP_ARB_CTL) & DISP_TILE_SURFACE_SWIZZLING) { swizzle_x = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10; ... } else { swizzle_x = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE; ... } } else { /* existing/old logic to decide about swizzling */ } } ... Plus no shortcut in i915_gem_init_swizzling. Personally I'd also just use a small helper function to compute preserve_bios_swizzle instead of storing it in dev_priv (since we will only use it at exactly one place), but that's a pure style preference. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
