On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:07:48PM +0530, shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> > > Conceptually, the MIPI registers are addressed by the MIPI transcoder > index, not the pipe. It doesn't matter right now, because there's a > 1:1 relationship between pipes and MIPI transcoders, but that change > allows us to break that link in the future > > V1: Created new patch to address Damien's review comment. > Replacing _PIPE calls to _TRANSCODER calls > V2: Re-basing on patch 2 > V3: Re-basing on patch 2 > V4: Re-basing on patch 2 > > Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> You still have a few inconsistencies here and there because you tried to get everything under 80 chars in a previous version. Oh well. I guess we can have a pass on top if someone's OCD is uncontrollable. Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
