On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:17:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:35:48PM +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add trace points for observing the atomic pipe update mechanism. > > > > v2: Rebased due to earlier changes > > v3: Pass intel_crtc instead of drm_crtc (Daniel) > > v4: Pass frame counter from the caller to evaded/end since > > the caller now always has that ready > > > > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Sourab Gupta <sourabgupta@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Akash Goel <akash.goels@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Merged up to this one here. Can you please update the review-AR for Akash > and Sourab for the remaining patches? Board updated. Akash and Sourab, please look through the remaining patches (6-9). I know it's a bit vague until we get the HSW+ situation resolved, but even the current patch should be a bit more correct than the code we have at the moment. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
