Reviewed-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@xxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 02:04:28PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The same register exists for querying and programming eDRAM AKA eLLC. So
> we can simply use it. For now, use all the same defaults as we had
> for Haswell, since like Haswell, I have no further details.
>
> I do not actually have a part with eDRAM, so I cannot test this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index c8969e3..0e6b502 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ void intel_uncore_early_sanitize(struct drm_device *dev)
> if (HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED(dev))
> __raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG, FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM);
>
> - if (IS_HASWELL(dev) &&
> + if ((IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) &&
> (__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, HSW_EDRAM_PRESENT) == 1)) {
> /* The docs do not explain exactly how the calculation can be
> * made. It is somewhat guessable, but for now, it's always
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
