From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>
The same register exists for querying and programming eDRAM AKA eLLC. So
we can simply use it. For now, use all the same defaults as we had
for Haswell, since like Haswell, I have no further details.
I do not actually have a part with eDRAM, so I cannot test this.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index c8969e3..0e6b502 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ void intel_uncore_early_sanitize(struct drm_device *dev)
if (HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED(dev))
__raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG, FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM);
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev) &&
+ if ((IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) &&
(__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, HSW_EDRAM_PRESENT) == 1)) {
/* The docs do not explain exactly how the calculation can be
* made. It is somewhat guessable, but for now, it's always
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
