On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:32:50AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2014-04-01 5:14 GMT-03:00 Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 08:59:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> On that topic, qa has finally found the drv_suspend/forcewake issue. Chris >> >> can you please pick out the minimal fix for that out of your tree? Maybe >> >> on top of Paulo's fixes so that I don't have to wreak the patch applying >> >> ;-) >> > >> > To be clear, are these the fixes in the tree already, or should I pull >> > in another branch first? Paulo? >> >> I think he wanted you to base your patches on top of just this >> specific commit: >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~pzanoni/linux/commit/?h=bdw-runtime-pm-2014-03-28&id=a4f3ebda1df2a0f24a7d480f67b153df8fc0c9f0 > > But the whole point of the rebalancing fix was to avoid having to apply > that patch? Management put down the hammer and told me that "runtime pm for bdw must go in _now_". So it's going to be this one apparently. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
