Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Rebalance runtime pm vs forcewake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:32:50AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2014-04-01 5:14 GMT-03:00 Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 08:59:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On that topic, qa has finally found the drv_suspend/forcewake issue. Chris
> >> can you please pick out the minimal fix for that out of your tree? Maybe
> >> on top of Paulo's fixes so that I don't have to wreak the patch applying
> >> ;-)
> >
> > To be clear, are these the fixes in the tree already, or should I pull
> > in another branch first? Paulo?
> 
> I think he wanted you to base your patches on top of just this
> specific commit:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~pzanoni/linux/commit/?h=bdw-runtime-pm-2014-03-28&id=a4f3ebda1df2a0f24a7d480f67b153df8fc0c9f0

But the whole point of the rebalancing fix was to avoid having to apply
that patch?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux