On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:39:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:10:41PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:08:44PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 06:41:51PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > > > Not implementing this W/A can lead to hangs. > > > > > > > > Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Rafael Barbalho <rafael.barbalho@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > From reading the HSD, it's not a workaround. It was a spec bug. I > > > presume the workaround name came from the workaround database? If it did > > > not, I'd just drop any mention of "workaround." If it's in the > > > workaround database, maybe just leave it so we can check later. > > > > > > Either way: > > > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Oh, and I think CC: stable > > Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. > -Daniel You want/need this in bdw-backports? -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
