Re: [PATCH 00/28] more i-g-t docs and api polish

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:18:37PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:18:34PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > So this thing turned out to be fairly ugly overall, and I don't think it's worth
>> > the effort to polish the series through some giant rebasing. make distcheck
>> > still works so I don't think I've fumbled this too badly and will hence just
>> > push the patches as-is.
>> >
>> > I'm still very much interested in feedback, I'll simply apply that as follow-up
>> > patches.
>
> Documenting the tools is far more important IMO (or does this exist
> already somewhere).

There are manpages which are semi-maintained. The goal here is to
reduce excuses for not writing testcases or not using i-g-t ;-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux