On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:06:38PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:54:48PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > As Broadwell has an increased virtual address size, it requires more
> > than 32 bits to store offsets into its address space. This includes the
> > debug registers to track the current HEAD of the individual rings, which
> > may be anywhere within the per-process address spaces. In order to find
> > the full location, we need to read the high bits from a second register.
> > We then also need to expand our storage to keep track of the larger
> > address.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 8 +++++---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 6 +++---
> > 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index ed67b4abf9e3..ee913b63a945 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -354,12 +354,12 @@ struct drm_i915_error_state {
> > u32 ipeir;
> > u32 ipehr;
> > u32 instdone;
> > - u32 acthd;
> > u32 bbstate;
> > u32 instpm;
> > u32 instps;
> > u32 seqno;
> > u64 bbaddr;
> > + u64 acthd;
> > u32 fault_reg;
> > u32 faddr;
> > u32 rc_psmi; /* sleep state */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > index b153a16ead0a..9519aa240614 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void i915_ring_error_state(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
> > err_printf(m, " TAIL: 0x%08x\n", ring->tail);
> > err_printf(m, " CTL: 0x%08x\n", ring->ctl);
> > err_printf(m, " HWS: 0x%08x\n", ring->hws);
> > - err_printf(m, " ACTHD: 0x%08x\n", ring->acthd);
> > + err_printf(m, " ACTHD: 0x%08llx\n", ring->acthd);
>
> %016x?
>
> if (gen8)
> %016x
> ?
I wasn't sure either, but I thought since we didn't do anything special
for BBADDR, to leave ACTHD alone.
I wonder if it would help splitting it up, having to count 8 extra
leading zeros is going to be a nightmare (especially as the decoder
doesn't pad it right either...)
For reading, I think I would prefer
err_printf(m, " ACTHD: 0x%016llx [0x%08x %08x]\n",
ring->acthd, (u32)(ring->acthd>>32), (u32)(ring->acthd));
or maybe just
err_printf(m, " ACTHD: 0x%08x %08x\n",
(u32)(ring->acthd>>32), (u32)(ring->acthd));
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
