On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Romain Francoise <romain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Please never just send a mail to maintainers, always cc mailing lists. >> >> Yes, sorry, I sent this privately because it wasn't a fully-formed bug >> report; I just wanted Jani to confirm that it wasn't intentionally >> broken as of -rc7. >> >>> Have you tested with the patch reverted to confirm that it's indeed >>> this commit and not something else (e.g. in the acpi code)? >> >> I hadn't, but I've now reverted the revert and things work again as in >> v3.13. So as far as I can tell the quirk is still definitely needed. > > I still don't think having the quirk is the way to go. Let's fix this > properly, shall we? > > Please file a new bug on DRM/Intel component at [1]. Please attach > intel_reg_dumper output (tool from intel-gpu-tools [2]) with and without > the revert. Please also attach dmesg with drm.debug=0xe from early boot. The register dump from *before* i915 gets loaded is also interesting. BR, Jani. > > Do you have the snb or ivb model? > > BR, > Jani. > > > [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=DRI > [2] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools/ > >> >> Thanks! >> -r > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
