On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:32:00AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 07:18:19PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:55:07AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:15:58AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Are you opposed to doing anything at context creation? pid reference > > > works for me too, or hold on to it with the request - I don't care. > > > > I'm just don't feel that the issue is severe enough for yet another pid > > reference floating around inside drm. I could well be wrong though, but > > I would like to be sure we have tried our best to use the available > > information we have already. > > -Chris > > > > -- > > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > > Well, the ref wouldn't be held if you just copied it at context create, > and it avoids having to stick in *file to actually do the proper look up > (not that that in itself is so horrible). > > For the sake of making progress, I disagree with Chris in tbut think it's > better than what is currently there, so: > Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Daniel? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx