On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:15:58AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:07:09PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > I still like my solution which does the strcpy on context creation. Your > > solution is deferred in the usual case since the hangcheck is > > asynchronous. The process could be long dead and gone. > > I disliked your solution since there was never a need to copy the string > upon process creation, you could just have kept a reference to the > pid... > > > Also, I think my solution is simpler, and with full PPGTT should get the > > same information. > > I disagree that your solution was simpler and just introduced redundant > storage. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre Are you opposed to doing anything at context creation? pid reference works for me too, or hold on to it with the request - I don't care. -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
