On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:17:25AM -0800, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Volkin, Bradley D > <bradley.d.volkin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > To test/merge, we'd have to change the series to take out the part where > > patch 02/13 sets I915_DISPATCH_SECURE to avoid a BUG_ON() when i915.enable_cmd_parser=1. > > But yes, otherwise the parsing works and I think should be sufficient for > > what Chris indicated he wants to test. > > Oh, I didn't spot this but this needs to be moved way back in the > series - we can only set the bit once we have the batchbuffer copy > logic in place. Otherwise there's a security hole open since userspace > is free to frob the batch residing in the ppgtt, which we just can't > prevent. Good point. I'll take it out and we can add it as part of the batch copy work. > -Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
