On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 04:59:10PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 04:12:06PM +0100, Thomas Richter wrote: > > On 01/07/2014 03:15 PM, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >From: Ville Syrjälä<ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > >Looks like I managed to break 830M in a few different ways recently. But I > > >recently found one for myself so hopefully that'll not happen again. > > > > > >I have a few other things lined up for 830M, but these are the quick fixes > > >that should get us back to the state we had before. > > > > Thanks, Ville! > > > > As a related note, I found that with the latest kernel, "uxa" > > drawing of filled rectangles became very slow (and sna is still too > > broken to be useful, sorry). Would you know which file I should look > > into to check for something like this? The client application only > > submits plain X11 calls, the render acceleration or composition > > should (?) not play a role here. It's really a plain simple filled > > rectangle (or many of them) that became notably slow. > > Wtf? What's up with SNA? There's a solitary report that cache coherency > on 830GM requires some workaround, on which I'd hoped that Daniel could > run igt to confirm (and now perhaps Ville might fancy the challenge). > Other than that, judging by my 845g, it should be solid. FWIW I haven't seen any issues w/ SNA on either 830 or 855, but I must admit that I've not done any extensive testing on either. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
