On Tue, 07 Jan 2014, Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - You removed INTEL_INFO, but all those IS_SOMETHING and HAS_SOMETHING > macros still accept dev as argument instead of dev_priv. Do we have > plans to change this too? I can remember many places where I had to > add a "dev" variable just because of these macros. Perhaps maybe the > new goal is a series removing the to_i915 macro? I could see a lot of > code getting almost entirely rid of "dev" with these changes. You can get from dev to dev_priv and back easily enough. Replacing dev with dev_priv in function parameters seems like pointless churn to me. If (and that's a big if) we wanted to "standardize" on one or the other, I'd go for struct drm_device *dev. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
