On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:52:27PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote: > Hi Ville, > > On Mon, 09 December 2013 ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > There appear to be some gen2 machines that don't really like the current PLL > > limits we have. We also have some accuracy problems with the PLL calculations. > > This series aims to eliminate those problems, and at least my 855 machine > > seems happier with these patches. > > > > Ville Syrjälä (5): > > drm/i915: Extract p2 divider correctly for gen2 LVDS dual channel > > drm/i915: Change N divider minimum from 3 to 2 for gen2 > > drm/i915: Increase gen2 vco frequency limit to 1512 MHz > > drm/i915: Fix 66 MHz LVDS SSC freq for gen2 > > drm/i915: Decrease gen2 vco frequency minimum to 908 MHz > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 8 ++++---- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > Here is my dmesg with the 5 patches applied (on top of 3.13-rc3 and > the PLL debug patch). > > The WARN() are not hit anymore. > <snip> > [ 46.584578] [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config], DPLL = 0x0 > [ 46.584581] [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config], DPLL_MD = 0x0 > [ 46.584583] [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config], FP0 = 0x0 > [ 46.584586] [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config], FP1 = 0x0 OK, so I think the problem got fixed, but my debug patch wasn't all that good since it doesn't dump the values we computed unless the clock is off. Can you still run this (as root) when the LVDS output is active: # intel_reg_read 0x6014 0x6018 0x6040 0x6044 0x6048 0x604c intel_reg_read is part of intel-gpu-tools. I just want to confirm we calculated the DPLL registers correctly. I know we at least got close since ther WARN is gone, but by my calculations we should get exactly the same as what the BIOS used. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
