On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 09:44 +0000, Manna, Animesh wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf
> > Of Jouni
> > Högander
> > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2025 12:20 PM
> > To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-xe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Add PSR pause/resume reference count
> >
> > We have now seen this:
> >
> > <4> [2120.434153] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] drm_WARN_ON(psr->paused)
> > <4> [2120.434196] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4430 at
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c:2227
> > intel_psr_pause+0x16e/0x180 [i915]
> >
> > Comment for drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, psr->paused) in
> > intel_psr_pause says:
> >
> > "If we ever hit this, we will need to add refcount to pause/resume"
> >
> > This patch is implementing PSR pause/resume refcount.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 26 +++++++++------
> > ----
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > index 99a6fd2900b9c..65c808bba1c6c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ struct intel_psr {
> > bool sink_support;
> > bool source_support;
> > bool enabled;
> > - bool paused;
> > + int pause_counter;
> > enum pipe pipe;
> > enum transcoder transcoder;
> > bool active;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > index 4e938bad808cc..4d4ecf7555b66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -2024,7 +2024,7 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_locked(struct
> > intel_dp
> > *intel_dp,
> >
> > intel_psr_enable_source(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> > intel_dp->psr.enabled = true;
> > - intel_dp->psr.paused = false;
> > + intel_dp->psr.pause_counter = 0;
> >
> > /*
> > * Link_ok is sticky and set here on PSR enable. We can
> > assume link
> > @@ -2210,7 +2210,6 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp,
> > */
> > void intel_psr_pause(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) {
> > - struct intel_display *display =
> > to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> > struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
> >
> > if (!CAN_PSR(intel_dp) && !CAN_PANEL_REPLAY(intel_dp)) @@
> > -
> > 2223,12 +2222,10 @@ void intel_psr_pause(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - /* If we ever hit this, we will need to add refcount to
> > pause/resume
> > */
> > - drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, psr->paused);
> > -
> > - intel_psr_exit(intel_dp);
> > - intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(intel_dp);
> > - psr->paused = true;
> > + if (intel_dp->psr.pause_counter++ == 0) {
> > + intel_psr_exit(intel_dp);
> > + intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(intel_dp);
> > + }
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> >
> > @@ -2251,13 +2248,14 @@ void intel_psr_resume(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> >
> > mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
> >
> > - if (!psr->paused)
> > - goto unlock;
> > + if (!psr->enabled) {
>
> Any reason not to check intel_dp->psr.pause_counter here, maybe we
> can check for !psr->enabled && psr->pause_counter > 0.
> Other changes are LGTM.
Where you would decrease pause_counter? Are you concerned on unbalanced
pause/resume calls?
BR,
Jouni Högander
>
> Regards,
> Animesh
>
> > + mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> > + return;
> > + }
> >
> > - psr->paused = false;
> > - intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
> > + if (--intel_dp->psr.pause_counter == 0)
> > + intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
> >
> > -unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -3322,7 +3320,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct intel_display
> > *display,
> > * we have to ensure that the PSR is not activated
> > until
> > * intel_psr_resume() is called.
> > */
> > - if (intel_dp->psr.paused)
> > + if (intel_dp->psr.pause_counter)
> > goto unlock;
> >
> > if (origin == ORIGIN_FLIP ||
> > --
> > 2.43.0
>
