Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for Improve type-safety on POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros (rev4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Patchwork (2025-02-28 07:09:40-03:00)
>== Series Details ==
>
>Series: Improve type-safety on POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros (rev4)
>URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144726/
>State : failure
>
>== Summary ==
>
>CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16198_full -> Patchwork_144726v4_full
>====================================================
>
>Summary
>-------
>
>  **FAILURE**
>
>  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_144726v4_full absolutely need to be
>  verified manually.
>  
>  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>  introduced in Patchwork_144726v4_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) to allow them
>  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>  
>
>Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
>------------------------------
>
>  No changes in participating hosts
>
>Possible new issues
>-------------------
>
>  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_144726v4_full:
>
>### IGT changes ###
>
>#### Possible regressions ####
>
>  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds@bcs0:
>    - shard-dg1:          [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] +1 other test incomplete
>   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16198/shard-dg1-16/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds@xxxxxxxxx
>   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144726v4/shard-dg1-12/igt@gem_exec_parallel@fds@xxxxxxxxx

If we look at

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144726v4/shard-dg1-12/dmesg1.txt

, we can see that the dynamic subtest actually passed. So the INCOMPLETE
here is possibly a result of some sync failure in CI tooling.

>
>  * igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible@c-hdmi-a1:
>    - shard-tglu:         [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +2 other tests fail
>   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16198/shard-tglu-4/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144726v4/shard-tglu-10/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>  * igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check@b-vga1:
>    - shard-snb:          [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6]
>   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16198/shard-snb1/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check@xxxxxxxxxxx
>   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144726v4/shard-snb5/igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check@xxxxxxxxxxx

Those two are possibly related to
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13734 .

>
>  * igt@perf_pmu@module-unload:
>    - shard-tglu-1:       NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][7]
>   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144726v4/shard-tglu-1/igt@perf_pmu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Possibly related to
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13029 .

--
Gustavo Sousa




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux