Whoops... This should've been v4. Let's see how Patchwork and CI will react. -- Gustavo Sousa Quoting Gustavo Sousa (2025-02-27 18:09:11-03:00) >Fix one issue[1] reported by the kernel test robot and also take this >opportunity to improve POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros by making them explicitly >return the expected enum type with patch #2. > >I decided to send this new version with patch #3 dropped in order to get >CI results and merge the already reviewed patches #1 and #2. Patch #3 >from the previous version is still under discussion and will probably be >respinned as a standalone patch. > >[1] https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502120809.XfmcqkBD-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > >--- >Gustavo Sousa (2): > drm/i915/display: Use explicit base values in POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros > drm/i915/display: Make POWER_DOMAIN_*() always result in enum intel_display_power_domain > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >--- >base-commit: 6badede10d92c242241bd7bf59a5488b5eba5aa7 >change-id: 20250227-improve-type-safey-power-domain-macros-8bf2a14f43f9 > >Best regards, >-- >Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@xxxxxxxxx> >
