Hi, On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hey Markus, > > Thanks for this. I hadn't realized that next_pseudo_random32() only > had two users left. Excellent. > > I'll queue this up in the random tree (unless there are objections > from the maintainers of that test code). actually would be better if we apply the i915 part in drm-tip rather than waiting for kernel releases to receive this change in our branch. It has been source of conflicts and headaches. May I ask Markus to split the patch in two parts and we handle the i915 side? Thanks, Andi
