Thanks Jesse. We will re-run and compare the power numbers. -----Original Message----- From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 2:43 AM To: S, Deepak Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/vlv: Add VLV specific force wake routines. Also, you might re-run your power numbers with Chris's patch to drop the force wake ref around the irq get/put. That's the only one we normally take at runtime, so getting rid of it should give you even greater power savings in conjunction with the RC6 timeout update patch I already pushed. Thanks, Jesse On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:33:22 +0000 "S, Deepak" <deepak.s@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks Jesse, I wil split the patches and send it for review. > > Thanks > Deepak > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:35 PM > To: S, Deepak > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/vlv: Add VLV specific force wake routines. > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 06:00:24 +0000 > "S, Deepak" <deepak.s@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Jesse, > > > > Thanks for the review. Below is my response. > > > > > - why not use the callback to __vlv_force_wake_* from > > gen6_gt_force_wake_*? i.e. why is VLV special here? > > [Deepak] Gen6 has a single power well whereas the VLV is has spate wells. This was the reason for the separate function > > > > > - having a new gen7_media_force_wake function may be better than > > passing an engine around, and would touch fewer pieces of code > > [Deepak] Even Gen7 is also as single Power Well. Having common function between gen7 and vlv might be difficult to individually handle the wells. > > > > >- have you done measurements on this? given how infrequently we > > ought to be waking the wells when they're idle, and how long we > > generally keep them awake, is this a real power win? > > [Deepak] By Individually controlling the wells we observed around 100mW - 200mW saving in different scenarios (GL Beanchmark & Media playback). > > wow, that's a significant savings. > > Can you split the patch into one that adds the power well arg, and another that adds the VLV support for the split? That would make it easier to review. > > Thanks, > -- > Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center > -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
