Hi, https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143951/ - Re-reported. i915.CI.BAT - Re-reported. Thanks, Ravali. -----Original Message----- From: I915-ci-infra <i915-ci-infra-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Gustavo Sousa Sent: 27 January 2025 19:01 To: I915-ci-infra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dmc_wl: Do not check for DMC payload Quoting Patchwork (2025-01-24 18:22:41-03:00) >== Series Details == > >Series: drm/i915/dmc_wl: Do not check for DMC payload >URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143951/ >State : failure > >== Summary == > >CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16018 -> Patchwork_143951v1 >==================================================== > >Summary >------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_143951v1 absolutely > need to be verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_143951v1, please notify your bug team > (I915-ci-infra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > External URL: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_143951v1/index.html > >Participating hosts (38 -> 37) >------------------------------ > > Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m > >Possible new issues >------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_143951v1: > >### IGT changes ### > >#### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@kms_pm_rpm@basic-rte: > - bat-apl-1: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16018/bat-apl-1/igt@kms_pm_rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_143951v1/bat-apl-1/ > igt@kms_pm_rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hi CI Team, DMC wakelock is not exercised for this platform. This should not be related to this patch. Could you please re-report? -- Gustavo Sousa
