Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/dmc_wl: Enable the debugfs only with enable_dmc_wl_debugfs=1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Jani Nikula (2025-01-27 09:01:39-03:00)
>On Fri, 17 Jan 2025, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> We use a spinlock to protect DMC wakelock debugfs data, since it is also
>> accessed by the core DMC wakelock logic. Taking the spinlock when the
>> debugfs is not in use introduces a small but unnecessary penalty.
>>
>> Since the debugfs functionality is only expected to be used for, uh,
>> debugging sessions, let's protect it behind a module parameter
>> enable_dmc_wl_debugfs. That way, we only take the lock if the feature
>> was enabled in the first place.
>
>If the debug struct were an opaque pointer, you could check for that
>being != NULL. Register the debugfs always, and have that initialize
>everything as needed?

Hm... I'm failing to see how this would keep us from having to take the
spinlock once we have the pointer being non-NULL.

The idea of the parameter is to protect us from taking the spinlock when
we are not debugging DMC wakelock offsets.

--
Gustavo Sousa

>
>BR,
>Jani.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c  |  5 +++++
>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h  |  1 +
>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl_debugfs.c  | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
>> index c4f1ab43fc0c..bc36d1b0ef87 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.c
>> @@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ intel_display_param_named_unsafe(enable_dmc_wl, int, 0400,
>>          "(-1=use per-chip default, 0=disabled, 1=enabled, 2=match any register, 3=always locked) "
>>          "Default: -1");
>>  
>> +intel_display_param_named_unsafe(enable_dmc_wl_debugfs, bool, 0400,
>> +        "Enable DMC wakelock debugfs"
>> +        "(0=disabled, 1=enabled) "
>> +        "Default: 0");
>> +
>>  __maybe_unused
>>  static void _param_print_bool(struct drm_printer *p, const char *driver_name,
>>                                const char *name, bool val)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h
>> index 5317138e6044..cb7dc1bc6846 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_params.h
>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct drm_printer;
>>          param(bool, psr_safest_params, false, 0400) \
>>          param(bool, enable_psr2_sel_fetch, true, 0400) \
>>          param(int, enable_dmc_wl, -1, 0400) \
>> +        param(bool, enable_dmc_wl_debugfs, false, 0400) \
>>  
>>  #define MEMBER(T, member, ...) T member;
>>  struct intel_display_params {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl_debugfs.c
>> index 1493d296ac98..f4e4c7a5a730 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl_debugfs.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
>>   * which exports a buffer of untracked register offsets and also allows extra
>>   * register offsets to be tracked by the driver.
>>   *
>> + * The debugfs directory is only exported if the module parameter
>> + * enable_dmc_wl_debugfs=1 is passed.
>> + *
>>   * Untracked offsets
>>   * -----------------
>>   *
>> @@ -411,6 +414,9 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_debugfs_register(struct intel_display *display)
>>  {
>>          struct dentry *dir;
>>  
>> +        if (!display->params.enable_dmc_wl_debugfs)
>> +                return;
>> +
>>          if (!HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK(display))
>>                  return;
>>  
>> @@ -453,6 +459,9 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_debugfs_log_untracked(struct intel_display *display, u32 offse
>>          struct intel_dmc_wl_dbg *dbg = &display->wl.dbg;
>>          unsigned long flags;
>>  
>> +        if (!display->params.enable_dmc_wl_debugfs)
>> +                return;
>> +
>>          spin_lock_irqsave(&dbg->lock, flags);
>>  
>>          if (!dbg->untracked.size)
>> @@ -479,9 +488,14 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_debugfs_log_untracked(struct intel_display *display, u32 offse
>>  bool intel_dmc_wl_debugfs_offset_in_extra_ranges(struct intel_display *display, u32 offset)
>>  {
>>          struct intel_dmc_wl_dbg *dbg = &display->wl.dbg;
>> -        bool ret = false;
>> +        bool ret;
>>          unsigned long flags;
>>  
>> +        if (!display->params.enable_dmc_wl_debugfs)
>> +                return false;
>> +
>> +        ret = false;
>> +
>>          spin_lock_irqsave(&dbg->lock, flags);
>>  
>>          if (!dbg->extra_ranges)
>
>-- 
>Jani Nikula, Intel




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux