Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for Check Scaler and DSC Prefill Latency Against Vblank (rev8)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Issues under "Possible regressions" are not related to any change in patches. Please do needful to re-report

Regards,
Mitul

From: Patchwork <patchwork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2025 5:50:58 PM
To: Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for Check Scaler and DSC Prefill Latency Against Vblank (rev8)
 
Patch Details
Series: Check Scaler and DSC Prefill Latency Against Vblank (rev8)
URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/143160/
State: failure
Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_143160v8/index.html

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_15993_full -> Patchwork_143160v8_full

Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_143160v8_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_143160v8_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

Participating hosts (12 -> 12)

No changes in participating hosts

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_143160v8_full:

IGT changes

Possible regressions

Known issues

Here are the changes found in Patchwork_143160v8_full that come from known issues:

IGT changes

Issues hit

Possible fixes

Warnings

{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

[i915#5354


[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux