Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/modes: Avoid divide by zero harder in drm_mode_vrefresh()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/29/2024 9:56 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

drm_mode_vrefresh() is trying to avoid divide by zero
by checking whether htotal or vtotal are zero. But we may
still end up with a div-by-zero of vtotal*htotal*...

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: syzbot+622bba18029bcde672e1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=622bba18029bcde672e1
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 11 +++++++----
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
index 6ba167a33461..71573b85d924 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
@@ -1287,14 +1287,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_set_name);
   */
  int drm_mode_vrefresh(const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
  {
-	unsigned int num, den;
+	unsigned int num = 1, den = 1;
if (mode->htotal == 0 || mode->vtotal == 0)
  		return 0;
- num = mode->clock;
-	den = mode->htotal * mode->vtotal;
-
  	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
  		num *= 2;
  	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN)
@@ -1302,6 +1299,12 @@ int drm_mode_vrefresh(const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
  	if (mode->vscan > 1)
  		den *= mode->vscan;
+ if (check_mul_overflow(mode->clock, num, &num))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (check_mul_overflow(mode->htotal * mode->vtotal, den, &den))

Can mode->htotal * mode->vtotal result in overflow?

and we should add:

if (check_mul_overflow(mode->htotal, mode->vtotal, &prod))
	return 0;

Regards,

Ankit

+		return 0;
+
  	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(mul_u32_u32(num, 1000), den);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_vrefresh);



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux