Some display MMIO transactions for offsets in the range that requires
the DMC wakelock happen in atomic context (this has been confirmed
during tests on PTL). That means that we need to use a non-sleeping
variant of MMIO waiting function.
Implement __intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl() and use it when
waiting for acknowledgment of acquire/release.
v2:
- No __intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl() wrapper to convert
i915 to display. (Jani)
- Add a quick explanation why DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT_US is defined
in microseconds. (Luca)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h | 10 +++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c | 24 ++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
index bb51f974e9e2..4561de5d5e10 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
@@ -117,6 +117,16 @@ __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(struct intel_display *display,
value, timeout);
}
+static inline int
+__intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl(struct intel_display *display,
+ i915_reg_t reg,
+ u32 mask, u32 value,
+ unsigned int fast_timeout_us)
+{
+ return __intel_wait_for_register(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
+ value, fast_timeout_us, 0, NULL);
+}
+
static inline int
intel_de_wait(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
index 05892a237d3a..9255505437d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
@@ -39,7 +39,11 @@
* potential future use.
*/
-#define DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT 5
+/*
+ * Define DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT_US in microseconds because we use the
+ * atomic variant of waiting MMIO.
+ */
+#define DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT_US 5000
#define DMC_WAKELOCK_HOLD_TIME 50
struct intel_dmc_wl_range {
@@ -78,9 +82,9 @@ static void intel_dmc_wl_work(struct work_struct *work)
__intel_de_rmw_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL, DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_REQ, 0);
- if (__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
- DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK, 0,
- DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT)) {
+ if (__intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
+ DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK, 0,
+ DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT_US)) {
WARN_RATELIMIT(1, "DMC wakelock release timed out");
goto out_unlock;
}
@@ -217,10 +221,14 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_get(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg)
__intel_de_rmw_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL, 0,
DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_REQ);
- if (__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
- DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK,
- DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK,
- DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT)) {
+ /*
+ * We need to use the atomic variant of the waiting routine
+ * because the DMC wakelock is also taken in atomic context.
+ */
+ if (__intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl(display, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
+ DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK,
+ DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK,
+ DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT_US)) {
WARN_RATELIMIT(1, "DMC wakelock ack timed out");
goto out_unlock;
}
--
2.47.0
