Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/i915/display: Use struct intel_display instead of struct drm_i915_private

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 01 Nov 2024, Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Let's start using struct intel_display instead of struct drm_i915_private
> when introducing new code. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> index e40d55f4c0c4..385c838ee996 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,11 @@ static struct drm_i915_private *tc_to_i915(struct intel_tc_port *tc)
>  	return to_i915(tc->dig_port->base.base.dev);
>  }
>  
> +static struct intel_display *tc_to_intel_display(struct intel_tc_port *tc)
> +{
> +	return to_intel_display(tc->dig_port->base.base.dev);
> +}
> +

to_intel_display(tc->dig_port) is sufficient here.

And that begs the question, do we need the helper? Maybe just use that
directly inline?

BR,
Jani.


>  static bool intel_tc_port_in_mode(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
>  				  enum tc_port_mode mode)
>  {
> @@ -1039,9 +1044,9 @@ static void wa_14020908590(struct intel_display *display, bool enable)
>  
>  static void __xelpdp_tc_phy_enable_tcss_power(struct intel_tc_port *tc, bool enable)
>  {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = tc_to_i915(tc);
> +	struct intel_display *display = tc_to_intel_display(tc);
>  	enum port port = tc->dig_port->base.port;
> -	i915_reg_t reg = XELPDP_PORT_BUF_CTL1(i915, port);
> +	i915_reg_t reg = XELPDP_PORT_BUF_CTL1(display, port);
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	assert_tc_cold_blocked(tc);
> @@ -1050,15 +1055,15 @@ static void __xelpdp_tc_phy_enable_tcss_power(struct intel_tc_port *tc, bool ena
>  	 * Gfx driver WA 14020908590 for PTL tcss_rxdetect_clkswb_req/ack
>  	 * handshake violation when pwwreq= 0->1 during TC7/10 entry
>  	 */
> -	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) == 30)
> -		wa_14020908590(&i915->display, enable);
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 30)
> +		wa_14020908590(display, enable);
>  
> -	val = intel_de_read(i915, reg);
> +	val = intel_de_read(display, reg);
>  	if (enable)
>  		val |= XELPDP_TCSS_POWER_REQUEST;
>  	else
>  		val &= ~XELPDP_TCSS_POWER_REQUEST;
> -	intel_de_write(i915, reg, val);
> +	intel_de_write(display, reg, val);
>  }
>  
>  static bool xelpdp_tc_phy_enable_tcss_power(struct intel_tc_port *tc, bool enable)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux