On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 01:05:25AM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915/scaler: Scaler code cleanups > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/140694/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_15607 -> Patchwork_140694v1 > ==================================================== > > Summary > ------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_140694v1 absolutely need to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_140694v1, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_140694v1/index.html > > Participating hosts (47 -> 46) > ------------------------------ > > Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m > > Possible new issues > ------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_140694v1: > > ### IGT changes ### > > #### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@i915_module_load@load: > - bat-arls-1: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15607/bat-arls-1/igt@i915_module_load@xxxxxxxxx > [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_140694v1/bat-arls-1/igt@i915_module_load@xxxxxxxxx Looks like this failed because we apparently depend on some extra scaler state copying being done in intel_crtc_prepare_cleared_state(). I'll need to figure out what to do about that eventually, but for now I'll probably just drop '[PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/scaler: Move pfit scaler into pfit state' which should avoid this problem. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
