Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use clamp_t() when limiting cur_delay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:56:52AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu,  7 Nov 2013 19:57:49 +0200
> ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Make the cur_delay limiting code a bit less prone to typo errors
> > by using clamp_t().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 6 ++----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > index 54338cf..b940ebe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > @@ -966,10 +966,8 @@ static void gen6_pm_rps_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >  	/* sysfs frequency interfaces may have snuck in while servicing the
> >  	 * interrupt
> >  	 */
> > -	if (new_delay < (int)dev_priv->rps.min_delay)
> > -		new_delay = dev_priv->rps.min_delay;
> > -	if (new_delay > (int)dev_priv->rps.max_delay)
> > -		new_delay = dev_priv->rps.max_delay;
> > +	new_delay = clamp_t(int, new_delay,
> > +			    dev_priv->rps.min_delay, dev_priv->rps.max_delay);
> >  	dev_priv->rps.last_adj = new_delay - dev_priv->rps.cur_delay;
> >  
> >  	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
> 
> What a nice little helper.

Indeed.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Both patches merged to dinq, thanks.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux