Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Include hblank restriction for xe3lpd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 04:11:20PM -0700, Matt Atwood wrote:
> From: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> hblank restriction now includes all of xe3.
> 
> v2: add additional definition instead of function, commit message typo
> fix and update.
> v3: restore lost conditional from v2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 4 ++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h           | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> index ed6aa87403e2..a99b41f258e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ intel_hdcp_disable_hdcp_line_rekeying(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  			intel_de_rmw(display,
>  				     TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(display, hdcp->cpu_transcoder),
>  				     0, TRANS_DDI_HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE);
> +		else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >=30)

We might want to take this opportunity to update the if/else ladder with
standard "newest platform first" rather than continuing to stack these
things in the wrong order.  Also, you're missing a space after the
comparison here.

But more fundamentally I still think there needs to be more
justification in the commit message for this.  Right now we're editing a
function that's labelled "/* WA: 16022217614 */" which implies we
shouldn't be doing real work here on platforms that the workaround
doesn't apply to (as is the case for Xe3).  So we probably need to move
that comment down to the specific conditions for the older platforms
that are impacted (and maybe re-write it in standard Wa_16022217614
notation to make it more greppable), and also add a bspec reference to
the commit message that reviewers can check to confirm that we really
should be disabling rekeying on platforms not impacted by the
workaround.

> +			intel_de_rmw(display,
> +				     TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(display, hdcp->cpu_transcoder),
> +				     0, XE3_TRANS_DDI_HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index d30459f8d1cb..fc30e0056b07 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -3833,6 +3833,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>  #define  TRANS_DDI_EDP_INPUT_C_ONOFF	(6 << 12)
>  #define  TRANS_DDI_EDP_INPUT_D_ONOFF	(7 << 12)
>  #define  TRANS_DDI_HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE	REG_BIT(12)
> +#define  XE3_TRANS_DDI_HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE	REG_BIT(15)

This line isn't sorted properly.


Matt

>  #define  TRANS_DDI_MST_TRANSPORT_SELECT_MASK	REG_GENMASK(11, 10)
>  #define  TRANS_DDI_MST_TRANSPORT_SELECT(trans)	\
>  	REG_FIELD_PREP(TRANS_DDI_MST_TRANSPORT_SELECT_MASK, trans)
> -- 
> 2.45.0
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux