On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 15:06 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 08:33:11AM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote: > > Currently vrr code is overwriting possibly set PSR PR Frame Change > > Enable > > bit in TRANS_PUSH register. Avoid this by using rmw instead of > > write. > > RMWs are not good if we ever want to do this from DSB/etc. We should > know what the state should be and just program that in. > > Does the PSR bit here have to match the PSR_CTL enable bit or > could we just always set the bit here based on has_psr whether > PSR is currently active or not? I will try that out. I'll guess this should be ok. BR, Jouni Högander > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c > > index 9a51f5bac3071..8b4e3f938efea 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c > > @@ -339,8 +339,8 @@ void intel_vrr_enable(const struct > > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > if (!crtc_state->vrr.enable) > > return; > > > > - intel_de_write(display, TRANS_PUSH(display, > > cpu_transcoder), > > - TRANS_PUSH_EN); > > + intel_de_rmw(display, TRANS_PUSH(display, cpu_transcoder), > > 0, > > + TRANS_PUSH_EN); > > > > if (HAS_AS_SDP(display)) > > intel_de_write(display, > > @@ -371,7 +371,9 @@ void intel_vrr_disable(const struct > > intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state) > > intel_de_wait_for_clear(display, > > TRANS_VRR_STATUS(display, > > cpu_transcoder), > > VRR_STATUS_VRR_EN_LIVE, 1000); > > - intel_de_write(display, TRANS_PUSH(display, > > cpu_transcoder), 0); > > + > > + intel_de_rmw(display, TRANS_PUSH(display, cpu_transcoder), > > TRANS_PUSH_EN, > > + 0); > > > > if (HAS_AS_SDP(display)) > > intel_de_write(display, > > -- > > 2.34.1 >
