On Thu, 10 Oct 2024, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Oct 2024, Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The function parse_lfp_panel_dtd() is called when the driver >> attempts to initialize the eDP connector, and it allocates memory, >> which is recorded in panel->vbt.lfp_vbt_mode. However, since no >> eDP panel is connected, the driver fails at intel_edp_init_dpcd() >> and follows the failure path. Unfortunately, the allocated memory >> is not freed in this case. >> >> To fix this issue, free the memory in the failure path. >> >> leak info from kmemleak: >> " >> unreferenced object 0xffff8881252f8800 (size 128): >> comm "systemd-udevd", pid 192, jiffies 4294896880 >> hex dump (first 32 bytes): >> e8 fd 00 00 00 04 18 04 a0 04 40 05 00 00 00 03 ..........@..... >> 03 03 09 03 26 03 00 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....&........... >> backtrace (crc 7448f6b4): >> [<ffffffff82475c9b>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4b/0x80 >> [<ffffffff814bb50e>] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x2be/0x390 >> [<ffffffffa069862c>] intel_bios_init_panel+0x1c4c/0x2720 [xe] >> [<ffffffffa0699123>] intel_bios_init_panel_early+0x13/0x20 [xe] >> [<ffffffffa06fceb9>] intel_dp_init_connector+0x2f9/0x1080 [xe] >> [<ffffffffa06c370a>] intel_ddi_init+0xbba/0xf50 [xe] >> [<ffffffffa069b906>] intel_bios_for_each_encoder+0x36/0x60 [xe] >> [<ffffffffa06d7bd6>] intel_setup_outputs+0x206/0x450 [xe] >> [<ffffffffa06dad33>] intel_display_driver_probe_nogem+0x163/0x1f0 [xe] >> [<ffffffffa0680fc7>] xe_display_init_noaccel+0x27/0x70 [xe] >> [<ffffffffa05b30d6>] xe_device_probe+0x806/0x9a0 [xe] >> [<ffffffffa0612f0f>] xe_pci_probe+0x31f/0x590 [xe] >> [<ffffffff81b41718>] local_pci_probe+0x48/0xb0 >> [<ffffffff81b432c8>] pci_device_probe+0xc8/0x280 >> [<ffffffff81d5dde8>] really_probe+0xf8/0x390 >> [<ffffffff81d5e11a>] __driver_probe_device+0x8a/0x170 >> " >> >> Signed-off-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c >> index 90fa73575feb..39ad71454d2b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c >> @@ -6801,6 +6801,7 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, >> >> out_vdd_off: >> intel_pps_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp); >> + intel_panel_fini(intel_connector); > > It's a bit hard to follow, but this breaks the symmetry. If we end up > here, intel_panel_init() hasn't been called yet, so we shouldn't call > intel_panel_fini() either. > > What we want to undo here is what was done by > intel_bios_init_panel_early() and intel_bios_init_panel_late(). The > appropriate function for that is intel_bios_fini_panel(). PS. The subject prefix should be "drm/i915/dp". This is not about xe display per se. BR, Jani. > > BR, > Jani. > >> >> return false; >> } -- Jani Nikula, Intel
