HI. > -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of > Saarinen, Jani > Sent: Friday, 4 October 2024 15.03 > To: Sousa, Gustavo <gustavo.sousa@xxxxxxxxx>; Nikula, Jani > <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; i915-ci-infra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Miscelaneous fixes for display tracepoints > (rev2) > > Hi. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of > > Gustavo Sousa > > Sent: Friday, 4 October 2024 14.43 > > To: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>; > > intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; > > i915-ci-infra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Miscelaneous fixes for display > > tracepoints > > (rev2) > > > > Quoting Jani Nikula (2024-10-04 08:33:20-03:00) > > >On Fri, 04 Oct 2024, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Quoting Patchwork (2024-09-26 16:28:07-03:00) > > >>>#### Possible regressions #### > > >>> > > >>> * igt@i915_selftest@live: > > >>> - bat-mtlp-6: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort > > >>> [1]: > > >>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15449/bat-mtlp- > > 6/igt@i915_selftest@xxxxxxxxx > > >>> [2]: > > >>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_137978v2/bat-mt > > >>> lp > > >>> -6/igt@i915_selftest@xxxxxxxxx > > >> > > >> This does not seem related to this series, which is only about > > >> tracepoints. > > >> > > >> Jani or Rodrigo, ack to merge this series without triggering a new > > >> CI cycle? I don't believe CI exercises tests that enable > > >> tracepoints. Or does it? > > > > > >BAT *must* pass before merging, no exceptions. > > > > Okay. Thanks. > See original BAT results mail it says " If you think the reported changes have > nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_137978v2, please notify your bug team > > > (I915-ci-infra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false > positives in CI." And ignore, I see you already added ci folks. > > > > -- > > Gustavo Sousa > > > > > > > >Full shard run failures can be looked over when it's clear the series > > >didn't cause the failures. > > > > > > > > >BR, > > >Jani. > > > > > > > > >-- > > >Jani Nikula, Intel
