Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract soc/intel_rom.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 10 Sep 2024, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Abstract away the nuts and bolts of the SPI vs. PCI ROM
> stuff, and hide it all in soc/intel_rom.c so that the
> VBT code doesn't have to care about this stuff.
>
> This leaves intel_bios.c with a single codepath that
> can focus on the details related to the VBT layout.
>
> This should have no functional changes.

Neat! Some nitpicks inline, but overall,

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>


>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile                 |   3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c     | 150 ++++------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_rom.c          | 160 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_rom.h          |  25 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile                   |   3 +-
>  .../xe/compat-i915-headers/soc/intel_rom.h    |   6 +
>  6 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_rom.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_rom.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/soc/intel_rom.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> index c63fa2133ccb..d14c8870aecb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ i915-y += \
>  i915-y += \
>  	soc/intel_dram.o \
>  	soc/intel_gmch.o \
> -	soc/intel_pch.o
> +	soc/intel_pch.o \
> +	soc/intel_rom.o
>  
>  # core library code
>  i915-y += \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 0b92b494117f..37d4b4ddfa95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -33,12 +33,12 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_edid.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_fixed.h>
>  
> +#include "soc/intel_rom.h"
> +
>  #include "i915_drv.h"
> -#include "i915_reg.h"
>  #include "intel_display.h"
>  #include "intel_display_types.h"
>  #include "intel_gmbus.h"
> -#include "intel_uncore.h"
>  
>  #define _INTEL_BIOS_PRIVATE
>  #include "intel_vbt_defs.h"
> @@ -3055,150 +3055,58 @@ static struct vbt_header *firmware_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
>  	return vbt;
>  }
>  
> -static u32 intel_spi_read32(struct intel_uncore *uncore, u32 offset)
> +static struct vbt_header *oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> +					struct intel_rom *rom,
> +					size_t *size, const char *type)
>  {
> -	intel_uncore_write(uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_ADDRESS, offset);
> +	struct vbt_header *vbt;
> +	size_t vbt_size;
> +	loff_t offset;
>  
> -	return intel_uncore_read(uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_TRIGGER);
> -}
> -
> -static u16 intel_spi_read16(struct intel_uncore *uncore, u32 offset)
> -{
> -	return intel_spi_read32(uncore, offset) & 0xffff;
> -}
> -
> -static struct vbt_header *spi_oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> -					    size_t *size)
> -{
> -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> -	u32 count, data, found, store = 0;
> -	u32 static_region, oprom_offset;
> -	u32 oprom_size = 0x200000;
> -	u16 vbt_size;
> -	u32 *vbt;
> -
> -	static_region = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, SPI_STATIC_REGIONS);
> -	static_region &= OPTIONROM_SPI_REGIONID_MASK;
> -	intel_uncore_write(&i915->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_REGIONID, static_region);
> -
> -	oprom_offset = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, OROM_OFFSET);
> -	oprom_offset &= OROM_OFFSET_MASK;
> +	if (!rom)
> +		return NULL;
>  
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(vbt_signature) != sizeof(u32));
>  
> -	for (count = 0; count < oprom_size; count += 4) {
> -		data = intel_spi_read32(&i915->uncore, oprom_offset + count);
> -		if (data == *((const u32 *)vbt_signature)) {
> -			found = oprom_offset + count;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	offset = intel_rom_find(rom, *(const u32 *)vbt_signature);
> +	if (offset < 0)
> +		goto err_free_rom;
>  
> -	if (count >= oprom_size)
> -		goto err_not_found;
> -
> -	if (sizeof(struct vbt_header) > oprom_size - count) {
> +	if (sizeof(struct vbt_header) > intel_rom_size(rom) - offset) {
>  		drm_dbg(display->drm, "VBT header incomplete\n");
> -		goto err_not_found;
> +		goto err_free_rom;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Get VBT size and allocate space for the VBT */
> -	vbt_size = intel_spi_read16(&i915->uncore,
> -				    found + offsetof(struct vbt_header, vbt_size));
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(vbt->vbt_size) != sizeof(u16));
>  
> -	if (vbt_size > oprom_size - count) {
> -		drm_dbg(display->drm,
> -			"VBT incomplete (vbt_size overflows)\n");
> -		goto err_not_found;
> +	vbt_size = intel_rom_read16(rom, offset + offsetof(struct vbt_header, vbt_size));
> +	if (vbt_size > intel_rom_size(rom) - offset) {
> +		drm_dbg(display->drm, "VBT incomplete (vbt_size overflows)\n");
> +		goto err_free_rom;
>  	}
>  
>  	vbt = kzalloc(round_up(vbt_size, 4), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!vbt)
> -		goto err_not_found;
> +		goto err_free_rom;
>  
> -	for (count = 0; count < vbt_size; count += 4)
> -		*(vbt + store++) = intel_spi_read32(&i915->uncore, found + count);
> +	intel_rom_read_block(rom, vbt, offset, vbt_size);
>  
>  	if (!intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(display, vbt, vbt_size))
>  		goto err_free_vbt;
>  
> -	drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Found valid VBT in SPI flash\n");
> +	drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Found valid VBT in %s\n", type);

There's some (pre-existing) drm_dbg vs. drm_dbg_kms discrepancy here.

>  
>  	if (size)
>  		*size = vbt_size;
>  
> +	intel_rom_free(rom);
> +
>  	return (struct vbt_header *)vbt;

The cast is now unnecessary.

>  
>  err_free_vbt:
>  	kfree(vbt);
> -err_not_found:
> -	return NULL;
> -}
> -
> -static struct vbt_header *oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> -					size_t *sizep)
> -{
> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(display->drm->dev);
> -	void __iomem *p = NULL, *oprom;
> -	struct vbt_header *vbt;
> -	u16 vbt_size;
> -	size_t i, size;
> -
> -	oprom = pci_map_rom(pdev, &size);
> -	if (!oprom)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(vbt_signature) != sizeof(u32));
> -
> -	/* Scour memory looking for the VBT signature. */
> -	for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i += 4) {
> -		if (ioread32(oprom + i) != *((const u32 *)vbt_signature))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		p = oprom + i;
> -		size -= i;
> -		break;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (!p)
> -		goto err_unmap_oprom;
> -
> -	if (sizeof(struct vbt_header) > size) {
> -		drm_dbg(display->drm, "VBT header incomplete\n");
> -		goto err_unmap_oprom;
> -	}
> -
> -	vbt_size = ioread16(p + offsetof(struct vbt_header, vbt_size));
> -	if (vbt_size > size) {
> -		drm_dbg(display->drm,
> -			"VBT incomplete (vbt_size overflows)\n");
> -		goto err_unmap_oprom;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* The rest will be validated by intel_bios_is_valid_vbt() */
> -	vbt = kmalloc(round_up(vbt_size, 4), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!vbt)
> -		goto err_unmap_oprom;
> -
> -	memcpy_fromio(vbt, p, vbt_size);
> -
> -	if (!intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(display, vbt, vbt_size))
> -		goto err_free_vbt;
> -
> -	pci_unmap_rom(pdev, oprom);
> -
> -	if (sizep)
> -		*sizep = vbt_size;
> -
> -	drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Found valid VBT in PCI ROM\n");
> -
> -	return vbt;
> -
> -err_free_vbt:
> -	kfree(vbt);
> -err_unmap_oprom:
> -	pci_unmap_rom(pdev, oprom);
> -
> +err_free_rom:
> +	intel_rom_free(rom);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3220,11 +3128,11 @@ static const struct vbt_header *intel_bios_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display
>  	 */
>  	if (!vbt && IS_DGFX(i915))
>  		with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref)
> -			vbt = spi_oprom_get_vbt(display, sizep);
> +			vbt = oprom_get_vbt(display, intel_rom_spi(i915), sizep, "SPI flash");
>  
>  	if (!vbt)
>  		with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref)
> -			vbt = oprom_get_vbt(display, sizep);
> +			vbt = oprom_get_vbt(display, intel_rom_pci(i915), sizep, "PCI ROM");
>  
>  	return vbt;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_rom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_rom.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..243d98cab8c3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_rom.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2024 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "i915_drv.h"
> +#include "i915_reg.h"
> +
> +#include "intel_rom.h"
> +#include "intel_uncore.h"
> +
> +struct intel_rom {
> +	/* for PCI ROM */
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +	void __iomem *oprom;
> +
> +	/* for SPI */
> +	struct intel_uncore *uncore;
> +	loff_t offset;
> +
> +	size_t size;
> +
> +	u32 (*read32)(struct intel_rom *rom, loff_t offset);
> +	u16 (*read16)(struct intel_rom *rom, loff_t offset);
> +	void (*read_block)(struct intel_rom *rom, void *data, loff_t offset, size_t size);
> +	void (*free)(struct intel_rom *rom);
> +};
> +
> +static u32 spi_read32(struct intel_rom *rom, loff_t offset)
> +{
> +	intel_uncore_write(rom->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_ADDRESS,
> +			   rom->offset + offset);
> +
> +	return intel_uncore_read(rom->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_TRIGGER);
> +}
> +
> +static u16 spi_read16(struct intel_rom *rom, loff_t offset)
> +{
> +	return spi_read32(rom, offset) & 0xffff;
> +}
> +
> +struct intel_rom *intel_rom_spi(struct drm_i915_private *i915)

Would be nice to get rid of struct drm_i915_private too, but then it
needs pci_dev and uncore, and we'll need to abstract uncore too, so
let's just roll with this as a concrete step forward.

> +{
> +	struct intel_rom *rom;
> +	u32 static_region;
> +
> +	rom = kzalloc(sizeof(*rom), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rom)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	rom->uncore = &i915->uncore;
> +
> +	static_region = intel_uncore_read(rom->uncore, SPI_STATIC_REGIONS);
> +	static_region &= OPTIONROM_SPI_REGIONID_MASK;
> +	intel_uncore_write(rom->uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_REGIONID, static_region);
> +
> +	rom->offset = intel_uncore_read(rom->uncore, OROM_OFFSET) & OROM_OFFSET_MASK;
> +
> +	rom->size = 0x200000;
> +
> +	rom->read32 = spi_read32;
> +	rom->read16 = spi_read16;
> +
> +	return rom;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 pci_read32(struct intel_rom *rom, loff_t offset)
> +{
> +	return ioread32(rom->oprom + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static u16 pci_read16(struct intel_rom *rom, loff_t offset)
> +{
> +	return ioread16(rom->oprom + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static void pci_read_block(struct intel_rom *rom, void *data,
> +			   loff_t offset, size_t size)
> +{
> +	memcpy_fromio(data, rom->oprom + offset, size);
> +}
> +
> +static void pci_free(struct intel_rom *rom)
> +{
> +	pci_unmap_rom(rom->pdev, rom->oprom);
> +}
> +
> +struct intel_rom *intel_rom_pci(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +	struct intel_rom *rom;
> +
> +	rom = kzalloc(sizeof(*rom), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rom)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	rom->pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev);
> +
> +	rom->oprom = pci_map_rom(rom->pdev, &rom->size);
> +	if (!rom->oprom) {
> +		kfree(rom);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	rom->read32 = pci_read32;
> +	rom->read16 = pci_read16;
> +	rom->read_block = pci_read_block;
> +	rom->free = pci_free;
> +
> +	return rom;
> +}
> +
> +u32 intel_rom_read32(struct intel_rom *rom, loff_t offset)
> +{
> +	return rom->read32(rom, offset);
> +}
> +
> +u16 intel_rom_read16(struct intel_rom *rom, loff_t offset)
> +{
> +	return rom->read16(rom, offset);
> +}
> +
> +void intel_rom_read_block(struct intel_rom *rom, void *data,
> +			  loff_t offset, size_t size)
> +{
> +	u32 *ptr = data;
> +	loff_t index;

Just nitpicking, but should this (and rom reads above) now sanity check
offset+size against rom->size? IDK if it's worth it for such a simple
thing. The caller is supposed to know what it's doing.

> +
> +	if (rom->read_block) {
> +		rom->read_block(rom, data, offset, size);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (index = 0; index < size; index += 4)
> +		*ptr++ = rom->read32(rom, offset + index);
> +}
> +
> +loff_t intel_rom_find(struct intel_rom *rom, u32 needle)
> +{
> +	loff_t offset;
> +
> +	for (offset = 0; offset < rom->size; offset += 4) {
> +		if (rom->read32(rom, offset) == needle)
> +			return offset;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
> +size_t intel_rom_size(struct intel_rom *rom)
> +{
> +	return rom->size;
> +}
> +
> +void intel_rom_free(struct intel_rom *rom)
> +{
> +	if (rom && rom->free)
> +		rom->free(rom);
> +
> +	kfree(rom);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_rom.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_rom.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fb2979c8ef7f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_rom.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2024 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __INTEL_ROM_H__
> +#define __INTEL_ROM_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct drm_i915_private;
> +struct intel_rom;
> +
> +struct intel_rom *intel_rom_spi(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +struct intel_rom *intel_rom_pci(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +
> +u32 intel_rom_read32(struct intel_rom *rom, loff_t offset);
> +u16 intel_rom_read16(struct intel_rom *rom, loff_t offset);
> +void intel_rom_read_block(struct intel_rom *rom, void *data,
> +			  loff_t offset, size_t size);
> +loff_t intel_rom_find(struct intel_rom *rom, u32 needle);
> +size_t intel_rom_size(struct intel_rom *rom);
> +void intel_rom_free(struct intel_rom *rom);
> +
> +#endif /* __INTEL_ROM_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index edfd812e0f41..dd1c0666e6bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ xe-$(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY) += \
>  # SOC code shared with i915
>  xe-$(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY) += \
>  	i915-soc/intel_dram.o \
> -	i915-soc/intel_pch.o
> +	i915-soc/intel_pch.o \
> +	i915-soc/intel_rom.o
>  
>  # Display code shared with i915
>  xe-$(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY) += \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/soc/intel_rom.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/soc/intel_rom.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..05cbfb697b2b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/soc/intel_rom.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2024 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "../../../i915/soc/intel_rom.h"

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux