Re: More questions and patches for 835GM/ns2501 DVO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03.11.2013 18:13, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Have you tried my patch to reorder the dvo sequence a bit? That /should/
get all these things right:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg34349.html
There's also a follow-up patch for you to test:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg34350.html

That would prove that the first patch does indeed work. Note that patch 1
in this series is already merged.
Thanks, I tried. Actually, this worked fairly (but not perfectly) well. I no longer get a "stuck DVO" as I did before, i.e. the "re-enable" logic is not triggered anymore. However, I do get (occasionally) a kernel-oops:

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2311 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1098 assert_cursor.constprop.68+0xba/0xc0 [i915]()
cursor on pipe A assertion failure (expected off, current on)
Modules linked in: cpufreq_stats binfmt_misc michael_mic arc4 ecb lib80211_crypt_tkip lib80211_crypt_ccmp fuse nfsd exportfs nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc loop firewire_sbp2 hostap_cs hostap snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus lib80211 snd_pcm i915 snd_page_alloc snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer psmouse snd pcmcia apanel input_polldev soundcore yenta_socket pcmcia_rsrc pcmcia_core lpc_ich i2c_i801 mfd_core pcspkr i2c_algo_bit rng_core serio_raw evdev drm_kms_helper drm fujitsu_laptop led_class intel_agp intel_gtt agpgart i2c_core video ac button hid_generic usbhid hid sg sr_mod cdrom firewire_ohci firewire_core crc_itu_t 8139too 8139cp mii uhci_hcd usbcore usb_common
CPU: 0 PID: 2311 Comm: Xorg Tainted: G        W    3.12.0-rc7+ #13
Hardware name: FUJITSU SIEMENS LIFEBOOK S Series/FJNB159, BIOS Version 1.06 07/02/2002
 c12f8c44 c1033def f8ad3990 f6adfab0 00000907 f8ad25d8 0000044a f8a81ffa
 f8a81ffa f5ca8000 00000041 00000000 f5ca8000 c1033eb3 00000009 f6adfa98
 f8ad3990 f6adfab0 f8a81ffa f8ad25d8 0000044a f8ad3990 00000041 f8adb9a0
Call Trace:
 [<c12f8c44>] ? dump_stack+0xa/0x13
 [<c1033def>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xb0
 [<f8a81ffa>] ? assert_cursor.constprop.68+0xba/0xc0 [i915]
 [<f8a81ffa>] ? assert_cursor.constprop.68+0xba/0xc0 [i915]
 [<c1033eb3>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x33/0x40
 [<f8a81ffa>] ? assert_cursor.constprop.68+0xba/0xc0 [i915]
 [<f8a83b90>] ? intel_disable_pipe+0x30/0xb0 [i915]
 [<f8a8491a>] ? i9xx_crtc_disable+0xca/0x2f0 [i915]
 [<f8a8b25e>] ? __intel_set_mode+0x7ae/0x13b0 [i915]
 [<f8a8e1f3>] ? intel_set_mode+0x23/0x40 [i915]
 [<f8a8e9bc>] ? intel_crtc_set_config+0x7ac/0x9d0 [i915]
 [<f802fe33>] ? drm_mode_set_config_internal+0x43/0xb0 [drm]
 [<f81386a5>] ? drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x45/0xac [drm_kms_helper]
 [<c11a7976>] ? fb_set_var+0x1a6/0x420
 [<c10eec6e>] ? __find_get_block+0x9e/0x160
 [<c11b56e0>] ? fbcon_blank+0x290/0x2d0
 [<c1203848>] ? do_unblank_screen+0x98/0x1b0
 [<c1201acd>] ? notify_update+0x1d/0x30
 [<c11faa12>] ? complete_change_console+0x52/0xe0
 [<c11fbba4>] ? vt_ioctl+0x1104/0x1220
 [<f802a1d0>] ? drm_setmaster_ioctl+0xe0/0xe0 [drm]
 [<c11faaa0>] ? complete_change_console+0xe0/0xe0
 [<c11f17da>] ? tty_ioctl+0x21a/0x9a0
 [<c10adb12>] ? do_wp_page.isra.92+0x2a2/0x650
 [<c10af428>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x318/0x610
 [<c11f15c0>] ? no_tty+0x20/0x20
 [<c10d66ac>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x7c/0x550
 [<c102d221>] ? __do_page_fault+0x1b1/0x490
 [<c10c7d17>] ? vfs_write+0x137/0x1b0
 [<c10d6bc6>] ? SyS_ioctl+0x46/0x80
 [<c12fc19e>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26
---[ end trace 85d231d1072e932a ]---

If this happens, I get a black screen with only a cursor on it. Switching to the console and back restores the screen.

I will try how the patch performs with an external monitor on.

BTW, there is a second issue related to this laptop: The vertical position of the boot console is sometimes off, and sometimes it is not visible at all. Sometimes it is too high (the first line is above the first line of the monitor) or too low (the first line is somewhere in the middle of the screen). Seems to me that some of the registers should only
be written to at the vertical blank?

Thanks, however! This is so far definitely an improvement. Will report back with the two-monitor setup.

Greetings,
    Thomas

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux