The current formula we use for HSW is not what is in current docs.
However, changing to the HSW formula on my HSW does not improve power
usage, and decreases performance by about 5% in limited xonotic testing.
For gen8, until we know otherwise, or run experiments, let's use
the HSW formula - which should be the same used in the Windows driver
(and thus help make an apples-applies comparison) on gen8.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 6d14182..3dd30f7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3924,7 +3924,10 @@ void gen6_update_ring_freq(struct drm_device *dev)
int diff = dev_priv->rps.max_delay - gpu_freq;
unsigned int ia_freq = 0, ring_freq = 0;
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 7) {
+ /* max(2 * GT, DDR). NB: GT is 50MHz units */
+ ring_freq = max(min_ring_freq, gpu_freq);
+ } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
ring_freq = mult_frac(gpu_freq, 5, 4);
ring_freq = max(min_ring_freq, ring_freq);
/* leave ia_freq as the default, chosen by cpufreq */
--
1.8.4.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
