Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove unused leftover basedie step code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 22 Aug 2024, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:39:46PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> The basedie step initialization as well as its last users were removed
>> in commit 326e30e4624c ("drm/i915: Drop dead code for pvc"). Follow
>> through with removing the unused macros and struct member and debug
>> logging.
>> 
>> Suggested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          | 5 -----
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 1 -
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h        | 1 -
>>  3 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index 3b1b16e71cf9..eb4c33e83c7c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -410,7 +410,6 @@ static inline struct intel_gt *to_gt(const struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>  
>>  #define INTEL_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.graphics_step)
>>  #define INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.media_step)
>> -#define INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.basedie_step)
>>  
>>  #define IS_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
>>  	(drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
>> @@ -420,10 +419,6 @@ static inline struct intel_gt *to_gt(const struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>  	(drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
>>  	 INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) >= (since) && INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) < (until))
>>  
>> -#define IS_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
>> -	(drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
>> -	 INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) >= (since) && INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) < (until))
>> -
>>  static __always_inline unsigned int
>>  __platform_mask_index(const struct intel_runtime_info *info,
>>  		      enum intel_platform p)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> index d92b3050ac78..b485e959f064 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> @@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ void intel_device_info_print(const struct intel_device_info *info,
>>  
>>  	drm_printf(p, "graphics stepping: %s\n", intel_step_name(runtime->step.graphics_step));
>>  	drm_printf(p, "media stepping: %s\n", intel_step_name(runtime->step.media_step));
>> -	drm_printf(p, "base die stepping: %s\n", intel_step_name(runtime->step.basedie_step));
>>  
>>  	drm_printf(p, "gt: %d\n", info->gt);
>>  	drm_printf(p, "memory-regions: 0x%x\n", info->memory_regions);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
>> index 83bd1190edf5..22f1d6905160 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
>> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ struct intel_step_info {
>>  	 */
>>  	u8 graphics_step;	/* Represents the compute tile on Xe_HPC */
>
> Looks like we should drop the comment on this line too (Xe_HPC is the
> name of PVC's IP)...

Cleanups for another time...

>
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the review, pushed this one.

BR,
Jani.

>
>>  	u8 media_step;
>> -	u8 basedie_step;
>>  };
>>  
>>  #define STEP_ENUM_VAL(name)  STEP_##name,
>> -- 
>> 2.39.2
>> 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux