On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 4:48 PM Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 2:08 PM Joonas Lahtinen > <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Andi Shyti (2024-08-06 12:46:07) > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > same question without the stable mailing list not to trigger the > > > automatic reply. > > > > > > > Andi Shyti (2): > > > > drm/i915/gem: Adjust vma offset for framebuffer mmap offset > > > > drm/i915/gem: Fix Virtual Memory mapping boundaries calculation > > > > > > I have forgotten to actually Cc the stable mailing list here. > > > These two patches need to be merged together even if only the > > > second patch has the "Fixes:" tag. > > > > > > I could have used the "Requires:" tag, but the commit id would > > > change in between merges and rebases. > > > > The patches were the top two in drm-intel-gt-next and committed > > only few hours ago so I fixed up the patches adding Cc: stable > > and Requires: > > I'm not very familiar with how the DRM trees work - shouldn't fixes in > i915 go on the separate drm-intel-fixes branch so that they don't have > to wait for a merge window? Ah, nevermind, I see it is already in drm-intel-fixes. Sorry for the noise.
