-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Jani Nikula
Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 6:39 AM
To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: remove a few __i915_printk() uses
>
> __i915_printk() does nothing for notice/info levels. Just use the
> regular drm_notice() and drm_info() calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@xxxxxxxxx>
-Jonathan Cavitt
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
> index 6f9e7b354b54..bee32222f0fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.c
> @@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ __i915_printk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const char *level,
>
> void add_taint_for_CI(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int taint)
> {
> - __i915_printk(i915, KERN_NOTICE, "CI tainted:%#x by %pS\n",
> - taint, (void *)_RET_IP_);
> + drm_notice(&i915->drm, "CI tainted: %#x by %pS\n",
> + taint, __builtin_return_address(0));
>
> /* Failures that occur during fault injection testing are expected */
> if (!i915_error_injected())
> @@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ int __i915_inject_probe_error(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int err,
> if (++i915_probe_fail_count < i915_modparams.inject_probe_failure)
> return 0;
>
> - __i915_printk(i915, KERN_INFO,
> - "Injecting failure %d at checkpoint %u [%s:%d]\n",
> - err, i915_modparams.inject_probe_failure, func, line);
> + drm_info(&i915->drm, "Injecting failure %d at checkpoint %u [%s:%d]\n",
> + err, i915_modparams.inject_probe_failure, func, line);
> +
> i915_modparams.inject_probe_failure = 0;
> return err;
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
