Re: [PATCH v2 i-g-t] tests/xe_gt_freq: Avoid RPe usage in subtests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Vinay

On 7/30/2024 5:47 AM, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
We are seeing several instances where the RPe, which can be altered by
pcode dynamically, is causing subtests to fail randomly. Instead of relying
on it, we can use a mid frequency value for these subtests and avoid these
failures.

v2: Fix bug in the tolerance function. Remove rpe usage from freq_range*
as well (Badal). Fix test documentation to reflect change (Riana).

Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2200
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2196
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2262
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2256
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2203
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2412

Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c b/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
index 93ebb5ed0..1ada37834 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
  #include <sys/time.h>
#define MAX_N_EXEC_QUEUES 16
+#define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER	50
+#define GT_FREQUENCY_SCALER	3
+#define FREQ_UNIT_MHZ	 DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER, GT_FREQUENCY_SCALER)
/*
   * Too many intermediate components and steps before freq is adjusted
@@ -70,9 +73,14 @@ static uint32_t get_freq(int fd, int gt_id, const char *freq_name)
  	return freq;
  }
-static uint32_t rpe(int fd, int gt_id)
+static bool within_expected_range(uint32_t freq, uint32_t val)
  {
-	return get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rpe");
+	/*
+	 * GT Frequencies are requested at units of 16.66 Mhz, so allow
+	 * that tolerance.
+	 */
+	return (freq <= val + FREQ_UNIT_MHZ) &&
+		(freq >= val - FREQ_UNIT_MHZ);
  }
static uint32_t get_throttle(int fd, int gt_id, const char *throttle_file)
@@ -128,6 +136,8 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int fd, int gt_id)
  {
  	uint32_t rpn = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rpn");
  	uint32_t rp0 = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rp0");
+	uint32_t rpmid = (rp0 + rpn) / 2;
+	uint32_t min_freq, max_freq;
/*
  	 * Negative bound tests
@@ -142,16 +152,18 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int fd, int gt_id)
  	/* Assert min requests are respected from rp0 to rpn */
  	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rp0) > 0);
  	igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "min") == rp0);
-	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpe(fd, gt_id)) > 0);
-	igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "min") == rpe(fd, gt_id));
+	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpmid) > 0);
+	min_freq = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "min");
Seeing the first issue after this change. Do we need a delay?

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11490/bat-adlp-7/igt@xe_gt_freq@freq_basic_api.html

Thanks,
Riana


+	igt_assert(within_expected_range(min_freq, rpmid));
  	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpn) > 0);
  	igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "min") == rpn);
/* Assert max requests are respected from rpn to rp0 */
  	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpn) > 0);
  	igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "max") == rpn);
-	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpe(fd, gt_id)) > 0);
-	igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "max") == rpe(fd, gt_id));
+	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpmid) > 0);
+	max_freq = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "max");
+	igt_assert(within_expected_range(max_freq, rpmid));
  	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rp0) > 0);
  	igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "max") == rp0);
  }
@@ -168,13 +180,16 @@ static void test_freq_fixed(int fd, int gt_id, bool gt_idle)
  {
  	uint32_t rpn = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rpn");
  	uint32_t rp0 = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rp0");
+	uint32_t rpmid = (rp0 + rpn) / 2;
+	uint32_t cur_freq, act_freq;
igt_debug("Starting testing fixed request\n"); /*
  	 * For Fixed freq we need to set both min and max to the desired value
  	 * Then we check if hardware is actually operating at the desired freq
-	 * And let's do this for all the 3 known Render Performance (RP) values.
+	 * And let's do this for all the 2 known Render Performance (RP) values
+	 * RP0 and RPn and something in between.
  	 */
  	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpn) > 0);
  	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpn) > 0);
@@ -190,17 +205,19 @@ static void test_freq_fixed(int fd, int gt_id, bool gt_idle)
  		igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act") == rpn);
  	}
- igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpe(fd, gt_id)) > 0);
-	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpe(fd, gt_id)) > 0);
+	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpmid) > 0);
+	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpmid) > 0);
  	usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
-	igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "cur") == rpe(fd, gt_id));
+	cur_freq = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "cur");
+	igt_assert(within_expected_range(cur_freq, rpmid));
if (gt_idle) {
  		igt_assert_f(igt_wait(xe_is_gt_in_c6(fd, gt_id), 1000, 10),
  			     "GT %d should be in C6\n", gt_id);
  		igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act") == 0);
  	} else {
-		igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act") == rpe(fd, gt_id));
+		act_freq = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act");
+		igt_assert(within_expected_range(act_freq, cur_freq));
  	}
igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rp0) > 0);
@@ -232,15 +249,17 @@ static void test_freq_fixed(int fd, int gt_id, bool gt_idle)
  static void test_freq_range(int fd, int gt_id, bool gt_idle)
  {
  	uint32_t rpn = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rpn");
+	uint32_t rp0 = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rp0");
+	uint32_t rpmid = (rp0 + rpn) / 2;
  	uint32_t cur, act;
igt_debug("Starting testing range request\n"); igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpn) > 0);
-	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpe(fd, gt_id)) > 0);
+	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpmid) > 0);
  	usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
  	cur = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "cur");
-	igt_assert(rpn <= cur && cur <= rpe(fd, gt_id));
+	igt_assert(rpn <= cur && cur <= rpmid + FREQ_UNIT_MHZ);
if (gt_idle) {
  		igt_assert_f(igt_wait(xe_is_gt_in_c6(fd, gt_id), 1000, 10),
@@ -248,7 +267,7 @@ static void test_freq_range(int fd, int gt_id, bool gt_idle)
  		igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act") == 0);
  	} else {
  		act = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act");
-		igt_assert(rpn <= act && act <= rpe(fd, gt_id));
+		igt_assert(rpn <= act && within_expected_range(act, cur));
  	}
igt_debug("Finished testing range request\n");
@@ -262,17 +281,19 @@ static void test_freq_range(int fd, int gt_id, bool gt_idle)
  static void test_freq_low_max(int fd, int gt_id)
  {
  	uint32_t rpn = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rpn");
+	uint32_t rp0 = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rp0");
+	uint32_t rpmid = (rp0 + rpn) / 2;
/*
  	 *  When max request < min request, max is ignored and min works like
  	 * a fixed one. Let's assert this assumption
  	 */
-	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpe(fd, gt_id)) > 0);
+	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpmid) > 0);
  	igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpn) > 0);
  	usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
/* Refresh value of rpe, pcode could have adjusted it */
-	igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "cur") == rpe(fd, gt_id));
+	igt_assert(within_expected_range(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "cur"), rpmid));
  }
/**



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux