Hi Easwar, On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/, > fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that > the approved verbiage exists in the specification. > > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Zhi Wang <zhiwang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ch7017.c | 14 ++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ch7xxx.c | 18 +++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ivch.c | 16 +++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ns2501.c | 18 +++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_sil164.c | 18 +++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_tfp410.c | 18 +++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 22 +++++++------- > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 20 ++++++------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c | 14 ++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 4 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 30 +++++++++---------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h | 4 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/edid.c | 28 ++++++++--------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/edid.h | 4 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/opregion.c | 2 +- > 18 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-) it's a complex/long patch and I want to make sure there are no subtle errors. I will submit another round of tests and if it convinces me, I will take it in. The failures you see[*] are definitely not related to this patch, but better safe safe safe than sorry sorry sorry :-) Thanks, Andi [*] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/131867/
