RE: Regression on linux-next (next-20240712)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2024 1:31 AM
> To: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx>;
> peili.dev@xxxxxxxxx; Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>; Saarinen, Jani
> <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx>; Kurmi, Suresh Kumar
> <suresh.kumar.kurmi@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> mm@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20240712)
> 
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:00:58 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > > Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide
> a fix if necessary?
> >
> > This is know.
> >
> > There is a discussion along the original patch [1] on how to do it
> > differently. But likely we'll tackle it differently [2]. So this patch
> > should be dropped for -- which I think already happened because I
> > cannot spot that patch in mm-unstable anymore.
> 
> Yes, I dropped it on July 15.

Thank you. Our CI runs seems to have recovered from the regression.

Regards

Chaitanya




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux