> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2024 1:31 AM > To: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx>; > peili.dev@xxxxxxxxx; Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>; Saarinen, Jani > <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx>; Kurmi, Suresh Kumar > <suresh.kumar.kurmi@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > mm@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20240712) > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:00:58 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide > a fix if necessary? > > > > This is know. > > > > There is a discussion along the original patch [1] on how to do it > > differently. But likely we'll tackle it differently [2]. So this patch > > should be dropped for -- which I think already happened because I > > cannot spot that patch in mm-unstable anymore. > > Yes, I dropped it on July 15. Thank you. Our CI runs seems to have recovered from the regression. Regards Chaitanya
