> -----Original Message----- > From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 2:23 PM > To: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: jiangshan.ljs@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nikula, Jani > <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>; Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx>; Kurmi, > Suresh Kumar <suresh.kumar.kurmi@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20240709) > > Hello > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 1:42 PM Borah, Chaitanya Kumar > > commit 1726a17135905e2d2773f18d47bd4e17dd26e1ed > > Author: Lai Jiangshan mailto:jiangshan.ljs@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Date: Thu Jul 4 11:49:13 2024 +0800 > > > > workqueue: Put PWQ allocation and WQ enlistment in the same lock C.S. > > ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > > > > We could not revert the patch because of merge conflict but resetting to the > parent of the commit seems to fix the issue > > > > Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide a > fix if necessary? > > > It has been fixed and it is in wq/for-6.11. > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZpASNBN0hpTVcjE-@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Thank you Lai for your response. Regards Chaitanya > Thanks > Lai
