On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:22:31AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2013/10/27 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:27:50PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> 2013/10/24 Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> > Production HSW does not need it. I confirmed this with Art. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> I just hope these things don't start uncovering bugs :) > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Merged the first 2 patches of this series. Not sure what to do with the > > other two, since fbc is essentially disabled on pre-hsw. And no one seems > > to really work on it :( So I only see minimal reasons to frob with it ... > > IMHO what you said is another reason to actually merge the other two > patches, since they make FBC-only WAs be applied only on FBC (e.g., > probably never). Oh, that was just a comment on top since the last 2 patches in this series are blocked on review comments anyway. I'll pull them in once that's settled. But maybe it spurs someone to work a bit on fbc ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
